Desain Instruksional Modul Perkuliahan Literasi Baca Tulis Responsif Gender untuk Mendorong Kesetaraan dan Inklusi di Pendidikan Dasar

Kemil Wachidah; Ahmad Fathoni

doi:10.36312/teacher.v6i2.4903

Kemil Wachidah Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Fakultas Psikologi dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Ahmad Fathoni INOVASI Kemitraan Pemerintah Australia-Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36312/teacher.v6i2.4903

Keywords: Module, Literacy, Gender, Primary School Teacher Education

Abstract

This study aims to develop gender-responsive literacy modules to improve the competencies of students in the Primary School Teacher Education Program (PGSD) at Muhammadiyah University Sidoarjo. The problem identified is the low literacy skills of students, which are influenced by the lack of learning modules that integrate principles of gender equity and sensitivity. Additionally, gender-based literacy achievement gaps due to social stereotypes pose a significant challenge in the learning process. The research method employed is Design-Based Research (DBR) with an iterative and collaborative approach between researchers and education practitioners. Data collection was conducted through pretest-posttest assessments, attitude and perception questionnaires, observations, and interviews to evaluate the effectiveness and validity of the modules during the implementation process. Quantitative data analysis used descriptive statistics, while qualitative data was analyzed thematically. The results of the study indicate that the gender-responsive literacy module developed is able to meet academic standards and the learning needs of students in an inclusive manner. The level of acceptance of the module in terms of usage, content, and response achieved scores between 86% and 97%, which is considered very good. The module also successfully instilled critical awareness of gender issues in literacy learning and supported the development of adaptive and equitable literacy skills for all PGSD students. This study recommends expanding the scope of the module and providing ongoing training for teachers so that gender-responsive principles can be optimally applied in basic education.

References

Ainscow, M., & Sandill, A. (2010). Developing inclusive education systems: The role of organizational cultures and leadership. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(4), 401–416.
Banks, J. A. (2015). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching (6th ed.). Pearson.
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2022). Statistik pendidikan di Indonesia. BPS RI.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
Fitriani, D. (2019). Pengembangan modul literasi baca tulis pada pendidikan dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(2), 123–132.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
Gee, J. P. (2012). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (4th ed.). Routledge.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391.
Hidayat, A., & Santoso, B. (2020). Studi literasi berbasis gender di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 5(1), 45–54.
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592.
Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. Routledge.
Kim, S., & Park, J. (2024). Gender-responsive differentiated instruction and student engagement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 38, 100496.
Kurniawati, Y. (2018). Tantangan pengembangan modul literasi responsif gender. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 7(3), 212–220.
Kuswanto, H., Sari, R., & Fadilah, N. (2020). Peningkatan kemampuan literasi mahasiswa PGSD. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 11(2), 77–86.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Liu, X., Chen, Y., & Zhang, L. (2024). AI-based adaptive learning applications and their impact on gender-responsive literacy education. Computers & Education, 190, 104623.
Martinez, M., Smith, L., & Brown, K. (2023). Preparing teachers for gender-responsive pedagogy: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125, 103982.
Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34–37.
OECD. (2019). Education at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing
OECD. (2021). The gender gap in education: What do we know? OECD Publishing.
Pinnell, G. S., & Fountas, I. C. (2009). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Heinemann.
Pratama, D., Nugroho, A., & Yulianti, S. (2021). Evaluasi modul literasi berbasis gender di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 9(4), 315–324.
Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society, 18(4), 429–450.
Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls. Simon & Schuster.
Sadia, N., & Nugroho, W. (2019). Pengaruh modul pembelajaran responsif gender terhadap hasil belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan, 10(1), 89–98.
Snow, C. E. (2016). Literacy and language: Relationships during early childhood. Routledge.
Syahputra, R., & Harahap, A. (2021). Studi kemampuan literasi mahasiswa PGSD di universitas swasta. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 15(2), 101–110.
UNESCO. (2017). Reading the past, writing the future: Fifty years of promoting literacy. UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2019). Global education monitoring report 2019: Gender report. UNESCO Publishing.
UN Women. (2020). Gender equality and education. UN Women.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wijayanti, R., & Sukma, I. (2022). Pendekatan partisipatif dalam pengembangan modul pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Inovatif, 8(1), 15–23.
Yuliani, S., Fitriani, D., & Kusuma, A. (2020). Modul literasi dan kesetaraan gender dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 6(3), 201–210.